<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MusicBrainz Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.musicbrainz.org/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.musicbrainz.org</link>
	<description>The place for MusicBrainz contributors to talk about their work</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 21:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Help wanted: Add release AR links to Wikipedia</title>
		<link>http://blog.musicbrainz.org/?p=336</link>
		<comments>http://blog.musicbrainz.org/?p=336#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 23:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mayhem</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.musicbrainz.org/?p=336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wendell and Sergey from MusicIP have done another crawl of Wikipedia &#8212; this time the goal was to match up releases in MusicBrainz with Wikipedia pages that exist for those releases.
Just like last time the results have been broken into convenient chunks of 100 with the proper links to let people verify the matches and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wendell and Sergey from MusicIP have done another crawl of Wikipedia &#8212; this time the goal was to match up releases in MusicBrainz with Wikipedia pages that exist for those releases.</p>
<p>Just like last time the results have been broken into convenient chunks of 100 with the proper links to let people verify the matches and quickly enter them into MusicBrainz.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re interested in helping, <a href="http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/MBWikipediaAlbumARs">please follow the instructions on the wiki</a> and jump in!</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.musicbrainz.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=336</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Testing PPC build of Picard</title>
		<link>http://blog.musicbrainz.org/?p=335</link>
		<comments>http://blog.musicbrainz.org/?p=335#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 21:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mayhem</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Picard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.musicbrainz.org/?p=335</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you have a PPC Mac that runs 10.4/10.5 and have been waiting for a DMG of Picard, please try download and install this version. Please let us know if it works in the comments.
Jon Hermansen and I have been working on building Picard with only MacPorts prerequisites &#8212; that is how this DMG has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have a PPC Mac that runs 10.4/10.5 and have been waiting for a DMG of Picard, please try <a href="http://users.musicbrainz.org/~robert/MusicBrainz%20Picard.r813-3.ppc.dmg">download and install this version</a>. Please let us know if it works in the comments.</p>
<p>Jon Hermansen and I have been working on building Picard with only <a href="http://macports.org">MacPorts</a> prerequisites &#8212; that is how this DMG has been built. If this install works then we can proceed to work on a Universal Binary that should work on 10.4/10.5. If we can reach that, we should be able to release Mac binaries at the same time as we release binaries for other platforms.</p>
<p>Thanks for all your hard work Jon!</p>
<p>UPDATE: We&#8217;ve found a problem with PUID generation and have fixed it &#8212; we hope. The above link now points to the updated dmg. May not work on Tiger yet &#8212; if you have a Tiger PPC box, please try it and let us know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.musicbrainz.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=335</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Squashing the rise of the sock puppets</title>
		<link>http://blog.musicbrainz.org/?p=334</link>
		<comments>http://blog.musicbrainz.org/?p=334#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 21:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mayhem</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Server]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.musicbrainz.org/?p=334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ve recently seen a rise in Sock Puppets here at MusicBrainz. We&#8217;ve observed editors creating separate sock puppet accounts who vote through the edits of the editor in order to get changes through MusicBrainz faster. This practice obviously side-steps our peer-review system,  and up until now we&#8217;ve had to have other editors go through [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve recently seen a rise in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_sock_puppet">Sock Puppets</a> here at MusicBrainz. We&#8217;ve observed editors creating separate sock puppet accounts who vote through the edits of the editor in order to get changes through MusicBrainz faster. This practice obviously side-steps our peer-review system,  and up until now we&#8217;ve had to have other editors go through and follow the trails of naughty editors to clean up after them.</p>
<p>To avoid this from happening continually, we&#8217;ve update the main server with a minor patch that requires people to have more than 10 approved edits in order to vote on other people&#8217;s edits. This makes creating a sock-puppet account much harder &#8212; each sock puppet account created will need to have a lot of work invested in it before it can be useful. We&#8217;re hoping that this simple tweak will discourage sock puppeteers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.musicbrainz.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=334</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Help wanted: Add Wikipedia ARs</title>
		<link>http://blog.musicbrainz.org/?p=333</link>
		<comments>http://blog.musicbrainz.org/?p=333#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 22:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mayhem</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.musicbrainz.org/?p=333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MusicIP did some matching between the MusicBrainz data and Wikipedia in order to find artists inside MusicBrainz that didn&#8217;t yet have an AR link referencing their Wikipedia page. Brian Freud then went and created a set of pages that make adding these links a snap. 
Now we need more help picking up a section of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MusicIP did some matching between the MusicBrainz data and Wikipedia in order to find artists inside MusicBrainz that didn&#8217;t yet have an AR link referencing their Wikipedia page. Brian Freud then went and created a set of pages that make adding these links a snap. </p>
<p>Now we need more help picking up a section of the list and going through each of the listed artists and adding the ARs. If you&#8217;re interested in helping out, please take a look at the <a href="http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/MBWikipediaARs">wiki page that coordinates this effort</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.musicbrainz.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=333</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Looking for a new style leader!</title>
		<link>http://blog.musicbrainz.org/?p=332</link>
		<comments>http://blog.musicbrainz.org/?p=332#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 22:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mayhem</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.musicbrainz.org/?p=332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The style guideline process has been stuck in neutral for quite some time and I was hoping that Panda could take over this role from Don Redman (who had been swallowed up by real life quite some time ago), but real life is about to swallow Panda for the foreseeable future. Thus, I start the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The style guideline process has been stuck in neutral for quite some time and I was hoping that Panda could take over this role from Don Redman (who had been swallowed up by real life quite some time ago), but real life is about to swallow Panda for the foreseeable future. Thus, I start the search for a new leader of the Style Council once again. </p>
<p>The new leader for the style council would need to:</p>
<ol>
<li>Review the process by which style guidelines get updated. Obviously this process is flawed.</li>
<li>Devise a new method by which the style council works on style guidelines. The new leader can choose to use the Wiki, the bug tracker, mailing lists, forums, smoke signals or anything else they choose. This process has to fit with the structure of MusicBrainz and our bottom up method for working together. I will personally work with the new style leader to define this process.</li>
<li>Document and implement the new process</li>
<li>Lead the style council.</li>
</ol>
<p>Qualifications of the new style leader include:</p>
<ol>
<li>Excellent communication skills</li>
<li>Excellent knowledge in music, especially classical.</li>
<li>Must not be embattled in current proposals. Ideally the leader would be neutral on existing proposals and keep an objective stance on new proposals as they move through the process.</li>
<li>Skillz in bringing about consensus. We need a strong communicator who can settle long raging debates and use their judgement to settle debates and remove contentious points from discussion. This leader needs to keep people focused when debates rage out of control.</li>
</ol>
<p>I would very much like to see the new style process be a bottom up process where the community brings about proposals much like they do today. The major difference is that the new style leader would have the authority and presence to move these proposals along when they get stuck. My vision is that this person isn&#8217;t a nanny who micro-manages the community of style people, but rather one who provides lubrication for the process to run smoothly. If something gets stuck, forgotten or argued to death, the leader should jump in an rectify the situation.</p>
<p>If this position interests you, please speak up in the comments. If you think someone in the community would make an excellent leader, but suspect that this person isn&#8217;t going to speak up, please nominate them in the comments. I will take the proposed people, chat with them and chat with members in the community to see how they feel about this person. Then, I&#8217;ll make a benevolent dictator decision and install the new style council leader and set them off to their task.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.musicbrainz.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=332</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Call for search server testing</title>
		<link>http://blog.musicbrainz.org/?p=331</link>
		<comments>http://blog.musicbrainz.org/?p=331#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 06:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mayhem</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Server]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.musicbrainz.org/?p=331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After I gave some history in the last post, I&#8217;d like to put out a call for testing for the new search server. In moving from Lucene to Xapian I&#8217;ve fixed a number of bugs, some of which have been lingering for a while. Also see the list of bugs we still have open and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After I gave some history in the last post, I&#8217;d like to put out a call for testing for the new search server. In moving from Lucene to Xapian I&#8217;ve <a href="http://bugs.musicbrainz.org/query?status=closed&amp;milestone=Search+server%3A+Xapian+search+engine">fixed a number of bugs</a>, some of which have been lingering for a while. Also see the list of <a href="http://bugs.musicbrainz.org/query?status=new&amp;status=assigned&amp;status=reopened&amp;milestone=Search+server%3A+Xapian+search+engine">bugs we still have open</a> and plan to fix before the release.</p>
<p>If you have a pet-peeve bug that&#8217;s been annoying you, please check to see how our new <a href="http://musicbrainz.homeip.net">Xapian test server</a> is handling things now. (Please be patient with our the dev server, the box needs an upgrade soon!)</p>
<p>If you are a fluent speaker in Chinese, Japanese, Korean or Thai, please take a moment to look up some artists! We had some problems with searching Chinese text, but I <em>think</em> I fixed it, but I am not proficient in any of the applicable languages, so please help sanity check me!</p>
<p>Unless I find more bugs, this new search server will go into production sometime next week. If you find a bug, please <a href="http://bugs.musicbrainz.org/newticket">report it to the usual place</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.musicbrainz.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=331</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Search: Why is it so important?</title>
		<link>http://blog.musicbrainz.org/?p=330</link>
		<comments>http://blog.musicbrainz.org/?p=330#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 22:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mayhem</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Picard]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Server]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.musicbrainz.org/?p=330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
After many days of tinkering, the new search server has passed its tests and is nearly ready for deployment next week. After my last post on the search services, there were lots of questions, so I&#8217;ll give some more history on why I&#8217;m working on this now:


The old Lucene based search services worked well, but [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
After many days of tinkering, the new search server has passed its tests and is nearly ready for deployment next week. After my last post on the search services, there were lots of questions, so I&#8217;ll give some more history on why I&#8217;m working on this now:
</p>
<ol>
<li>The old Lucene based search services worked well, but installing them was a major pain. Installing compilers by hand, sacrificing chickens and hoping that things would work wasn&#8217;t my idea of fun.</li>
<li>Lucene has a philosophy of working out of the box without significant tweaks. That&#8217;s great if you&#8217;re indexing a bunch of text, but indexing music metadata from an SQL database is a bit of a different beast. The usual Lucene tricks didn&#8217;t work so well for us, so we couldn&#8217;t tweak it to work better for us. <a href="http://xapian.org">Xapian</a> requires a little more tuning out of the box, but our search results are much better now than they were before.</li>
<li>Sending metadata lookup traffic to a service like Xapian is generally a good idea, as a single Xapian server can handle lookup traffic more elegantly than a Postgres database. And adding more search servers is easier than adding more database servers.</li>
<li><a href="http://stats.musicbrainz.org/webstats/stimpy/www.musicbrainz.org/">Our traffic is growing</a> &#8212; I expect us to handle twice as much traffic in July as we did the July before. A lot of this traffic growth is coming from people using our web-service to look up music. If the web-service slows down, the rest of the site slows down as well. So I&#8217;m trying to stay ahead of the curve an anticipate when we reach capacity and be able to add more machines as necessary</li>
</ol>
<p>
As of next week, MusicBrainz will have twice as much rack-space (20U&#8217;s of space!) and we can finally rack the two new servers that were donated a few months ago. Fortunately due to dropping bandwidth costs, this new space doesn&#8217;t really come at a greater expense to us &#8212; I expect our hosting costs to stay nearly the same as they are now. (about $1000/mo, btw)
</p>
<p>
This will allow us to have 3 times the search capacity we have now, which should keep the site working for a while longer. In fall I hope to start moving our web-service to Amazon&#8217;s EC2 service, which should allow us to get as much capacity as we need.
</p>
<p>
As soon as I get the new search services deployed I&#8217;m putting my head down and coding the next server update. So, keep your fingers crossed that this process goes smoothly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.musicbrainz.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=330</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bug tracker in read-only mode for a while</title>
		<link>http://blog.musicbrainz.org/?p=329</link>
		<comments>http://blog.musicbrainz.org/?p=329#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mayhem</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.musicbrainz.org/?p=329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dave was working on upgrading software on our catch-all server and ran into some problems with plugins for trac, our bug tracking system. Trac is currently up, but the plugin to log-in hasn&#8217;t been installed yet, so no one can log into track right now.
Dave will continue working on this in about 8-10 hours of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave was working on upgrading software on our catch-all server and ran into some problems with plugins for trac, our bug tracking system. Trac is currently up, but the plugin to log-in hasn&#8217;t been installed yet, so no one can log into track right now.</p>
<p>Dave will continue working on this in about 8-10 hours of time. Sorry for the inconvenience!</p>
<p>UPDATE: Everything is back to normal now. Thanks Dave!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.musicbrainz.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=329</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Discographies database schema review</title>
		<link>http://blog.musicbrainz.org/?p=328</link>
		<comments>http://blog.musicbrainz.org/?p=328#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 23:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mayhem</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.musicbrainz.org/?p=328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;re interested in Niklas&#8217; Summer of Code project to implement Discography support in MusicBrainz, I would suggest that you follow his blog and read his latest entry: &#8220;Database design and a question to users&#8220;. Niklas and I have been working on the design of the database tables that will enable his SoC project. We [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re interested in Niklas&#8217; Summer of Code project to implement Discography support in MusicBrainz, I would suggest that you follow <a href="http://niklasbe.wordpress.com">his blog</a> and read his latest entry: &#8220;<a href="http://niklasbe.wordpress.com/2008/06/17/database-design-and-a-question-to-users/">Database design and a question to users</a>&#8220;. Niklas and I have been working on the design of the database tables that will enable his SoC project. We think we&#8217;re collecting the right information, but I&#8217;m nearly always wrong. So, if you have database design experience, please take a look at this latest post has tell us just how <a href="http://xkcd.com/386/">wrong we are</a>. <img src='http://blog.musicbrainz.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.musicbrainz.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=328</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mac OS X Developer for Picard releases wanted</title>
		<link>http://blog.musicbrainz.org/?p=327</link>
		<comments>http://blog.musicbrainz.org/?p=327#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 21:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mayhem</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Picard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.musicbrainz.org/?p=327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Its clear that I won&#8217;t find the time to package up Picard for OS X anytime soon. I&#8217;ve put out one Intel based DMG, but haven&#8217;t found the time to create a Universal Binary package of Picard. 
If you have the following:

Knowledge of building Mac OS X Application Bundles
Python knowledge
Love for Picard
Access to Intel and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its clear that I won&#8217;t find the time to package up Picard for OS X anytime soon. I&#8217;ve put out one Intel based DMG, but haven&#8217;t found the time to create a Universal Binary package of Picard. <img src='http://blog.musicbrainz.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
If you have the following:</p>
<ul>
<li>Knowledge of building Mac OS X Application Bundles</li>
<li>Python knowledge</li>
<li>Love for Picard</li>
<li>Access to Intel and PPC Macs</li>
</ul>
<p>We would very much like to talk to you. The last item isn&#8217;t crucial &#8212; I suppose we can get people in the community to test your builds for platforms you have no access to. Please leave a comment if you&#8217;re interested in helping out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.musicbrainz.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=327</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
